Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Nonetheless, co-localization of QTL for different traits may provide an approximation for comparing the genetic architecture underlying different but potentially related traits.
A general proportionality factor can be considered as a feasible approximation for comparing the results, as only few of the contaminants commonly measured will require a substance-specific conversion factor.
Similar(58)
The parameters of the numerical analysis for comparing the performance of approximations 1 and 2 are presented in Table 1. Figure 2a,b shows the results in 3D graphs.
Table 1 Parameter setting in numerical analysis for comparing the performance of approximations 1 and 2 Parameter Setting Number of channels (C) 12 Reserved channels (T) 4 μ H,μ BE,μ nRT 1 λ nRT 0.5 λ H 0.5×i, i=1,2,…,10 λ BE 0.5×i, i=1,2,…,10 Figure 2 CBP and CDP performance of system approximations 1 and 2 for a system with C=12, T=6, and λ nRT=0.5.(a) CBP and (b) CDP.
Petry (1983) obtained this approximation by comparing the moments of the stationary allele-frequency distribution for the two-locus model to those for the one-locus model.
The power for comparing two means based on the normal approximation method was reported where indicated.
Comparing the error bounds for similar and dissimilar DNA motifs shows that the approximation for similar DNA motifs yields large bounds.
A visual illustration comparing the actual outage region and the SLA approximation for N = 3 is shown in Figure 5.
For this purpose, we compare the approximation of G given by (6) with the 'exact' formula (3).
The obtained p-values (computed using a normal approximation) were compared to the level of significance α = 0.001, using the Bonferroni correction to account for the multiple comparisons.
It takes into account (measures) the interdependency between the estimated parameters and therefore provides a better approximation for the complexity term compared with methods that apply a fixed term for each additional parameter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com