Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Gajewski, Coffland, Boyle, Bott, Price, Leopold and Dunton [ 26] laid important groundwork from an empirical perspective by demonstrating the approximate equivalency of measuring content validity using relevance scales versus using correlation scales.
Similar(59)
In sensitivity analysis, we approximated "full time equivalency" in our workforce density by multiplying the percentage of providers reporting direct patient care as their primary role in each state with our state-level workforce density and repeated our analyses (both Spearman coefficients and all linear regression models) using these attenuated workforce densities for adults and children.
Although Gajewski et al. [ 26] has demonstrated the appropriateness of measuring content validity using relevance scales, the equivalency with measuring content validity using correlation scales is approximate, which may have an effect on the parameter estimation.
That's a false equivalency.
energy equivalency or better".
There is no moral equivalency.
Such an equivalency is false.
How approximate!
But Hastings rejects moral equivalency.
I got my equivalency diploma.
(He earned an equivalency degree).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com