appropriations on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "appropriations on" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to financial allocations or budgetary matters, but it lacks proper context and structure. Example: "The committee discussed the appropriations on education funding for the upcoming fiscal year."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Among important standing committees are those on appropriations, on ways and means (which handles matters related to finance), and on rules.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But it was apparent that although these people had passed trillions of bills, resolutions and budget appropriations on the subject of domestic violence, many of them had no clue about what made it a peculiarly corrosive crime.

The New York Times

Using panel data on state appropriations at hundreds of public institutions between 1976 and 1996, a study by the economist Brad Humphreys estimates that institutions that joined Division I-A gained $6 million in appropriations on average, compared to institutions with no change in division status.

The New York Times

"It is a travesty when communities are terrorized and innocent people are victimized simply because evidence that could be used to prevent these crimes sits untested on a shelf somewhere," said Steve Cohen, a Democrat representing Tennessee, in a statement before the House approved the appropriations on May 30.

The Guardian

Hatfield served as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations on two different occasions.

Wikipedia

AB 1148 passed Appropriations on the party-line vote of 12 Democrats for, five Republicans against.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

A statement by the Senate Republican leadership said Mr. Craig had "agreed to comply" with a request to step down as the top Republican on the Veterans Affairs Committeee, on the Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior, and the Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests.

The New York Times

Mensa was speaking about cultural appropriation on The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore.

The Guardian

It can't help but suggest a pattern of extensive appropriation on Ms. Prada's part, which she denies.

The New York Times - Arts

In the desperate, tourist-courting world of cultural appropriation on Broadway, this bland revival of the 1982 musical does not rank as a major offender.

The New York Times

But appropriation on many levels existed before the postmodern movement, and this method continues to play a role in the creation of contemporary art.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always specify what the appropriations are intended for to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example, "appropriations for education" is clearer than just "appropriations".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "appropriations on" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "appropriations for" to correctly indicate the purpose of the financial allocation. For example, instead of "appropriations on research", use "appropriations for research".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "appropriations on" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically intended to specify the subject or area to which allocated funds are directed. However, according to Ludwig, this construction is grammatically questionable, impacting clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

33%

Encyclopedias

17%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "appropriations on" is considered grammatically incorrect and is not recommended for use in formal writing. Ludwig AI suggests that the phrase lacks proper context and structure, and it is more appropriate to use alternatives such as "appropriations for", "funding for", or "allocations for" to clearly indicate the purpose of the financial allocation. While the phrase appears in some news and media sources, its usage is infrequent and can lead to confusion. For clarity and correctness, it is best to avoid "appropriations on" and opt for grammatically sound alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

appropriations for

Replaces "on" with "for" to clearly indicate the purpose of the appropriations.

funding for

Uses "funding" instead of "appropriations" for a more general term, paired with "for" to specify the allocation's purpose.

allocations for

Similar to "funding for", "allocations" specifies resources set aside for a particular use.

budget allocations for

Adds "budget" to emphasize that these are planned allocations within a budget.

financial support for

Emphasizes the supportive role of the appropriations, specifying financial backing.

funds allocated to

Shifts the focus to the receiving end of the funding, using "allocated to".

resources designated for

Highlights the official designation of resources for a specific purpose.

monies assigned to

Uses "monies" for a formal tone and "assigned to" to show the assignment of funds.

expenditures for

Focuses on the spending aspect, using "expenditures" to refer to allocated amounts.

grants for

Specifically refers to appropriations in the form of grants for specific projects or initiatives.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use the word "appropriations" in a sentence?

The word "appropriations" typically refers to funds allocated for a specific purpose. A correct usage would be "appropriations "for education"" or "budget appropriations "for healthcare"".

Is it grammatically correct to say "appropriations on"?

No, the phrase "appropriations on" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use "appropriations "for"" to specify the purpose of the allocated funds.

What are some alternatives to "appropriations on" that I can use?

Instead of "appropriations on", you can use phrases like "funding for", "allocations for", or "budget for" to clearly indicate the purpose of the appropriations.

How does the usage of "appropriations for" differ from "appropriations on"?

The phrase "appropriations for" is grammatically correct and indicates the intended use of the funds. The phrase "appropriations on" is not standard English and can lead to confusion. Therefore, it is best to use "appropriations "for"" to maintain clarity and correctness.