Radical right libertarianism advocated, for example, by Rothbard (1978 , 1982, Narveson (1988: ch. 7; 1999), and Feser (2005)—holds that that there are no fair share constraints on use or appropriation.[1] Agents may appropriate, use, or even destroy whatever natural resources they want (as long as they violate no one's self-ownership).
The maximally strong version of a constraint on original appropriation holds that initially no one has any liberty right to use, or any moral power to appropriate, natural resources.
Erenthal is short, with yellow eyes and bleach-blond hair that when we met was braided close to her head like much of her art, an appropriation of one of the worst constraints of her childhood.
Conflicts over the appropriation, management and use of forest resources can pose significant constraints to sustainable forest management.
This constraint applies not only at the point of appropriation (with subsequent holdings being altogether unconstrained), but must be respected through time.
In the case of running, parkour and skateboarding, existing constraints can initiate in-motion improvisation and re-appropriation of existing surroundings, allowing the city to become a playground for any individual willing to hijack an urban space.
Given these constraints, and in line with de Certeau's conceptualisation of appropriation and subversion within structural constraints, we suggest that women have developed tactics for 'making do' [ 24].
As 100 members of Congress wrote the president recently, "[G]iven budget constraints, we cannot continue to rely on general authorizations and appropriations to finance high-speed rail.
Given that libertarianism conceives of distributive justice as primarily historical in nature, there are two places where constraints on legitimate holdings may be introduced: at the point of original appropriation or at the point of transfers (or both).
Despite the revenue constraints that colleges faced during the recession, such as lowered state and local appropriations, institutions did not drastically cut spending.
