Sentence examples for appropriateness score from inspiring English sources

Of the 17 vignettes, that representing case type 2 (people with depression or anxiety whose admission was precipitated by the risk of self-harm) was considered most appropriate for inpatient admission, with an appropriateness score of 95.4 %.

CART was used to build a classification tree with the appropriateness score of the panel ratings as a dependent variable, as categorical variable (appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate).

The two clinical scenarios with the highest appropriateness score were restaging for detection of local recurrence and treatment response evaluation.

This is needed to have a simple match of indication and imaging type, leading directly to an appropriateness score, and the branching logic is needed to determine appropriateness based on clinical data from electronic medical record (EMR) and provider.

The mean Appropriateness Score was 0.30 (SD, 0.23; range 0 1.0), indicating that they thought gifts from PRs were more likely to be inappropriate than to be appropriate.

There were modest but statistically significant positive correlations between Promotional Activity Index Score and Informational Value Score (r = 0.161; p<.001) and between Promotional Activity Index Score and Appropriateness Score (r = 0.158; p<.0.158

In contrast, no-one considered case types 26 or 31 to be definitely suitable for admission, whilst the appropriateness scores for the five case types considered least appropriate for hospital care (the marginal inpatient case types) ranged from 11.8 to 28.6%%.

The use of opinion was made explicit byemploying a structured questionnaire, appropriateness scores, andconsensus scores with a Delphi technique.

Cronbach's alpha for Appropriateness Scores was 0.65.

Appropriateness Scores were calculated for 1405 physicians (99.6%) who completed both items.

This preference was also reflected in the higher appropriateness scores for "all-worst" versus "pits" (median appropriateness scores (IQR): 7.0 (5.0, 9.0) vs. 4.0 (0, 8.0), p < 0.001).