The phrase "appropriateness precision" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the accuracy or suitability of something, but it is not commonly recognized.
Example: "In our analysis, we must ensure appropriateness precision to align our findings with the intended audience."
Alternatives: "suitability accuracy" or "relevance precision".
The fineness of the laser scanning measurement system indicated its appropriateness for high-precision phenotyping in plant breeding as well as for detailed morphological measuring questions in the fields of biology and agronomy.
There is simply a sustained beauty of phrasing, a close care for the thing to be said and the best way to say it, that blend of precision and appropriateness that has always characterized the best prose, an attentiveness to the truth of human feeling that is in itself a supremely civilized value.
Fitzpatrick et al. [ 11] outlined a number of criteria (appropriateness, reliability, validity, responsiveness, precision, interpretability, acceptability, feasibility) on which evidence should be provided in order to select an appropriate outcome measure, and very few papers have assessed utility measures with regard to such criteria [ 12].
Twelve experts reviewed the tool for content validity and gave feedback about each item regarding its precision, feasibility and appropriateness on a scale of 1 to 4 (1= very inappropriate, 2= inappropriate, 3= appropriate, and 4= very appropriate).
The methods are compared in term of precision, ease of implementation and appropriateness to the problem type.
This was done to probe for its simplicity, precision in the words, acceptance and appropriateness for the participants' educational level and to minimize any leading or confusing questions.
Twenty intervention and 20 comparison practices allowed an estimation of effect size on appropriateness of referrals for familial cancer with a precision of ±11% as measured by the 95% confidence interval (CI) width, equivalent to 80% power to detect a 15% difference between arms.
Three professional judges expressed their evaluations about the following points: appropriateness of movements for a given musical genre; the precision to track the rhythm; the aesthetic impact of the whole sequence of movements; and the overall judgment of the robot performance.
A sample of 1440 subjects as a minimum is required to determine an appropriateness level of at least 50% with an absolute precision of 4% and a 95% CI.
They raise questions about the appropriateness of imposing arbitrary limits on the acceptability of accuracy and precision of cardiac index measurement, suggesting that the percentage error of agreement was only one marker of acceptability of a method.
