The phrase "appropriateness of sampling" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, statistics, or data collection, where the suitability of the sampling method is being evaluated.
Example: "The appropriateness of sampling in this study is crucial to ensure the validity of the results."
Alternatives: "suitability of sampling" or "relevance of sampling".
Individual item analysis showed substantial agreement for the description of random allocation, investigator and subject blinding, appropriateness of sample size, reporting of attrition, and reporting of statistical tests.
Did the sampling strategy include consideration of the stability of the compound in question with respect to the appropriateness of sample collection and storage methods?
Figure 1a, b show a detailed analysis of the appropriateness of sample and completion of test request forms for histopathological examination (n = 150) and Serum tumor marker estimation (n = 100).
Depending on the study design, there were up to 21 items, including, for example, the definition of a research objective, use of randomization, control for confounding, use and reporting of adequate statistical methods and appropriateness of sample size.
Appropriateness of study design; Suitability of data collection strategy; Appropriateness of sample and sampling method; Appropriateness of analytic approach/tools; Level of control over confounding variables (quantitative studies) or level to which research context was adequately considered (qualitative studies); Whether interpretation of findings was justified by the data.
We compared the appropriateness of overrides between sampling units and provider types by drug and override reason.
However, preliminary tests as KMO and Bartlett's test assured the appropriateness of our sample for trustworthy factor analyses.
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity were used to assess the appropriateness of the sample for the factor analysis [ 30, 31].
While systematic omission of relevant evidence, and its associated biases, is anathema for any systematic review, reviewers increasingly acknowledge that it is the appropriateness of the sample, not its comprehensiveness, that is the critical factor [ 13].
In the following paragraphs, we interpret the meaning of each PC axis with literature surveys to assess appropriateness of the sample classifications based on our expression profile, and to decode insights into the differentiation and the growth control.
