Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
40 We chose the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, a two-round modified Delphi method 41 to select the most appropriate criteria.
Recommendations were scored according to an approach based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.
The collective score was established using a methodology derived from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method [10].
Clinical specifications were prioritized in agreement with the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.
Each recommendation was then evaluated and rated by each expert using a methodology derived from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.
Each expert rated each recommendation using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with three rating rounds after eliminating outliers (experts with deviating opinions).
As most of the founded studies were conducted in non-ICU patients, we studied experts' opinion about the feasibility and completeness of the concept program in ICU patients during a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Delphi study [1].
The collective score was established using a methodology derived from the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method [6]: after elimination of the extreme values (outliers), the median and confidence interval of the scores were calculated.
The collective scoring was established using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method [9]: after elimination of the extreme values (outliers), the median and confidence interval of the individual scores were calculated.
Disagreement was calculated according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method handbook [ 31].
We scored the ratings using an adaptation of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method [ 12, 13].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com