The phrase "appropriate to human" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey suitability or relevance to humans, but it lacks proper grammatical structure.
Example: "The design of the interface should be appropriate for human use to ensure ease of understanding."
Alternatives: "suitable for humans" or "relevant to human needs".
The research concluded with a proposition towards digitization of products which could perhaps be an all round solution to make products more appropriate to human emotions.
While human beings have many appetites informed by sense cognition of the world, they also have rational appetite that is informed by an intellectual apprehension of the world and the goods within it appropriate to human flourishing.
Impressed by empirical methods and cognizant of their poor fit with the Aristotelian ideal, he defines a distinct kind of knowledge, one inferior to genuine scientific knowledge but appropriate to human sensory capacities.
But because Locke grounded certain knowledge on knowledge of essences, which he felt were forever hidden from us, he was forced to defend this weaker form of knowledge as appropriate to human knowledge.
Even though he referred to it as "the oldest, clearest and most appropriate to human reason", he nevertheless rejected it, heading section VI with the words, "On the impossibility of a physico-theological proof".
That led agricultural economist Mark Nerlove to introduced the notion of adaptive expectation (more appropriate to Humans) rather than rational expectation (that fit Econs).
Addressing which mechanisms operate in humans, and thus which animal model is most appropriate to study human laterality disorders, remains a critically important issue in the field of evolutionary developmental biology.
The art-conscious fabric designs, visible in clothing as well as the expanses of cloth that resemble wall hangings, often have patterns whose enormous scale is not really appropriate to the human frame.
Thus, on one side of the dispute, there were ranged philosophers who took their stand upon what has been called "the unity of science" and who insisted that the categories and procedures appropriate to the human studies do not enjoy a unique or privileged status that somehow sets them apart from those characteristic of systematic empirical enquiry in other domains.
With regard to the models that were considered appropriate to calculate human intake fractions, a decision tree was elaborated based on the model assessment, providing rough guidance for model choice in specific situations.
These policy candidates need to be validated by the policy management system before being communicated in an appropriate manner to human IAM engineers for refinement.
