In a few places, we have emphasized that evolution might tune specific parameters, and we have added appropriate citations for this idea.
*Citations for which Wikipedia is original source of information (citations about Wikipedia, and Wikipedia used in methods) were considered most appropriate citations of Wikipedia.
This should be acknowledged by an appropriate citation within the Introduction.
The LBD? We apologize for omitting the appropriate citation.
However, scholarly activity should maintain a high standard of conduct by following appropriate citation protocols.
These journals accounted for 2.2% (n=3) of cases in which Wikipedia was the most appropriate citations (as previously defined).
Another minor point: the use of the first two citations is strange, I am sure that more appropriate citations can be found for the theoretical-methodological background they are cited for initially.
Climate Wizard website provides users with documentation and basic information about relevant publications, appropriate citations, and conditions-of-use restrictions for each data set.
Looking at the data, I do think that the manuscript has value but I would have expected a much more balanced paper (with the inclusion of appropriate citations and better emphasis on what's novel) for publication in eLife.
This comment has now been added to the manuscript along with the appropriate citations.
Be sure to follow the appropriate reference citation style for your target journal, as described in its Instructions to Authors.
