The phrase "approaches we selected" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to specific methods or strategies that have been chosen for a particular purpose or project.
Example: "In our research, we will focus on the approaches we selected to ensure the best outcomes."
Alternatives: "methods we chose" or "strategies we opted for".
To minimize variability in sampling approaches, we selected quantitative data from each study that were collected using comparable sampling schemes.
To facilitate the understanding of and between the approaches, we selected three approaches for a more detailed description (Table 1).
Based on comparisons of the objective scores and benchmark scores between the two approaches, we selected a simple hill-climbing approach as the default.
In order to provide direct comparison of the methods and derive a real-world estimate of the extent of understated cardiovascular risk by using time-to-first-event approaches, we selected to use a class of parametric survival models that is amenable to different approaches and then applied the various approaches to a single significant epidemiologic data set – the CHS.
To validate our hybridisation and analytical approaches, we selected three high-amplitude events (HDs at the CDKN2A and RB1 loci and amplification at the CCNE1 locus) to determine the consistency between the assigned DNA copy number status and the expression levels of the target proteins.
Using the forward selection approach, we selected five independent marginal SNPs (i.e. rs3733588, rs874432, rs4697695, rs9291683 and rs11734783) capturing most marginal effects of the region, where the first three are within SLC2A9 and the latter two are intergenic between WDR1 and ZNF518B.
Using a selective gene expression profiling approach, we selected 36 animals based on a previously created genomic Obesity Index for RNA sequencing of subcutaneous adipose tissue.
As treatments to test with this new culture approach, we selected activin A and its highly selective and potent antagonist, follistatin (Barakat et al, 2012).
To test the new approach, we selected two different soil moisture fields, Oklahoma (130 km × 130 km) and Illinois (300 km × 500 km), during 1995 2009 and 1994 2010, respectively.
We lamented that whatever approach we selected meant compromising at least one component of learning — whether failing to cover the basics of "what happened," neglecting the "big picture," or not stimulating personal contributions to the material.
Through this integrative approach, we selected 70 key candidate associations between structural genes and metabolites, and experimentally validated eight novel associations, two of them showing differential genetic regulation in the two environments studied.
