Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Dr. Mayberg said the findings could help explain why a combination of the two approaches was often better than either one alone.
During the last decades, the use of both modelling approaches was often met with resistance, mainly because of the need of calibration, validation and determination of the level of uncertainty (e.g.: [13 15]).
During the last decades, the use of both modelling approaches was often met with resistance, mainly because of the need of calibration, validation and determination of the level of uncertainty (e.g.: [ 13- 15]).
Great enthusiasm for these approaches was often reported by those leading improvement efforts, but we also sometimes observed a tendency towards uncritical or indiscriminate use, and some evidence of 'magical thinking'thishinitiativeive will solve many problems easily and quickly').
Similar(56)
Classical approaches are often limited to isotropic materials like metals.
But in practice, the two approaches are often seen as antagonistic.
Thus, fully automatic approaches are often infeasible for many practical applications.
To identify the causal mutations responsible for these traits, two different approaches are often used.
Numerical and analytical modelling approaches are often competing to describe a desired phenomenon.
In today's development environment, multidisciplinary research and integrated approaches are often called for yet rarely tried or successfully implemented.
Furthermore, these approaches are often computationally expensive with the increase of data size.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com