Sentence examples for approaches to explanation from inspiring English sources

van Fraassen (1980), especially Chapter Six and Achinstein (1983) are classic statements of pragmatic approaches to explanation.

Taken in itself the observation just described seem completely uncontroversial and not in conflict with approaches to explanation that are usually viewed as paradigmatically traditional.

Although there is a growing literature in this area, the most prominent philosophical advocates of pragmatic approaches to explanation have so far tended not to make use of it.

However, it is worthwhile (and, provides additional insight into both approaches), to consider the possibility that some of the ideas associated with each might be combined, thus enlarging the space of possible approaches to explanation.

This deflationary notion of agency is weaker and less controversial than the notion of agency that Peter Godfrey-Smith (2009) has challenged through his critique of rationalizing and optimizing approaches to explanation within evolutionary biology, approaches exemplified by Dawkins' (1976 [1989]) classic appeal to selfish genes.

It is natural to connect this conception of laws with unificationist approaches to explanation: if laws are generalizations that play a central role in the achievement of simple (and presumably unified) deductive systemizations, then by appealing to laws in explanation, we achieve explanatory unification this makes it intelligible why it is desirable that explanations invoke laws[32].

Within the framework of logical empiricism, and specifically within Hempel's approach to explanation, there was a clear answer.

This suggestion fits naturally with the unificationist approach to explanation but encounters similar difficulties in articulating the idea of a "best systematization".

By the early 1970s, Hempel's approach to explanation (known as the covering-law model) seemed to be in trouble on a number of fronts, leading philosophers to canvass alternative treatments.

This approach to explanation seems to have been developed under the influence of contemporary mathematicians and medical writers.

Although some of Aristotle's illustrations are not immediately pellucid, his approach to explanation is reasonably straightforward.