Sentence examples for approaches that differed from inspiring English sources

Participants were asked to comment on the pros and cons associated with three implementation approaches that differed by responsibility, and to recommend an optimal approach.

Comparison and analysis of the pros and cons associated with contrasting implementation approaches that differed by onus of responsibility further emphasized that enabling users to implement guidelines by providing them with instructions and tools for doing so represents the most productive avenue for ongoing investigation and practice (Table 3).

Focused on a sloping arable land (100 ha) affected by distinct water erosion, we tested for this purpose two conceptually different predictive approaches that differ in the nature of the spectroscopic predictor variables.

For sources other than 750 MW power plants, however, States retain the discretion to adopt approaches that differ from the guidelines.

Indeed, four linearization approaches, that differ according to the stage of introduction of the linearization process in the computations, are discussed.

For example, the UK and the US may be adopting approaches that differ with respect to protecting commercial banks from more speculative, proprietary trading, but the policy concerns are broadly similar – and may not be so pressing elsewhere, where banking traditions are different and trading is more restrained.

In the following, according to[10] we describe two manual optimization approaches that differ in terms of adaptation to the considered deployment scenario.

Research into combination effects of genotoxic chemicals has typically employed concepts and approaches that differ in important ways from those underpinning other areas of mixture toxicology.

Taken together, evidence clearly suggests that health interventions and attempts to mitigate adverse health outcomes in migrant communities may require approaches that differ from those required by the locally born community.

Participants recommended approaches that differ from current practice for extrapolating high-dose animal data to low-dose human exposures, including categorical approaches for integrating information on MOA, statistical approaches such as model averaging, and inference-based models that explicitly consider uncertainty and interindividual variability.

Strengths of this study include that attitudes, empowerment, and locus of control were analyzed together for the first time in large groups of patients subjected for many years to treatment approaches that differ in the weight they assign to communication and interpersonal relationships and were proved repeatedly to differ in the clinical, educational, and psychological outcomes they produce (10).