Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(26)
The analytical and numerical approaches show a good agreement.
The results of the two area-based approaches show a trend between crowdsourced and "true" field damage severity, which can be improved by weighting high-performing volunteers.
Comparisons with simple geometrical models indicate that analytical approaches show a good trend but tend to underestimate the pore curvature, in particular at high solid fractions, where pores have to penetrate the thin liquid channels.
However, both of the analytical approaches show a big discrepancy in the estimation of the exponent which is critical to identify the type of nucleation and growth mechanism in the non-isothermal crystallization even though they have been derived from the same Avrami approach.
The Bin and Two-Phase-Mapping approaches show a major blocking ratio on some periods and a higher cumulative cost.
However, both approaches show a similar rate of increase in their average link utilization at higher network load.
Similar(34)
Recent examinations of intertidal systems by a range of investigators using new approaches show an abundance of biofilm communities.
Models based on DT, RF, and SVM statistical approaches show an accuracy of prediction up to the order of 89 %.
Current clinical approaches showed a poor efficacy especially in small diameter artery substitutions (<6 mm).
In the adjusted model, the posterior approaches showed a higher risk of revision due to dislocation than the direct lateral approaches, with an RR of 1.3 (CI: 1.1 1.7).
Minimally invasive surgical approaches showed a higher risk of revision due to dislocation than the direct lateral approach after adjustment for covariates (RR = 4.2, CI: 2.3 7.7).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com