Exact(2)
The performance comparison of different sampling approaches on five scan pairs is shown in Table 2.
To evaluate DFM and compare the result with DPM, we have employed both approaches on five discrete network traces including Darpa 1999 attack and attack-free traces [33], CAIDA anonymized Internet traces October 2012 [34], MAWI traffic archive December 2012 [35], and Dal2010 data sets: 1. Darpa 1999 network traces consists of 5 weeks of traces generated at the MIT Lincoln Lab [33].
Similar(58)
We test and compare solution approaches on two sets of instances with different geography scenarios, size, information dynamism, and order timing variability.
Our approach is different from general matrix completion-based recommendation approaches on two major aspects.
It tests and compares different approaches on three extensively studied benchmarks.
We evaluated the different approaches on two recently published datasets.
The performance of integrative ME is compared to other related approaches on three cancer studies.
We compare RankCost to several representative approaches on four medical data sets varying in size, imbalanced ratio, and dimension.
We show that CODEC outperforms these approaches on two large-scale datasets, attaining higher values of specificity and sensitivity.
To evaluate the performance of the iterative k-means algorithm, we compared ten partitioning scheme selection approaches on ten different datasets (Table 1).
We perform a comprehensive evaluation of our approach on five challenging simulated scenarios using a simulation approach acceptable to industry [1].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com