The phrase "approaches consider the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing different methods or strategies that take into account a specific factor or aspect.
Example: "Various approaches consider the impact of climate change on agricultural practices."
Alternatives: "methods take into account" or "strategies regard the".
The majority of the approaches consider the problem of optimising conflicting quality attributes simultaneously.
To illustrate the difference between these approaches, consider the task of building a system, equipped with an optical scanner, that recognizes the letters of the alphabet.
It also uses the probabilistic weighting of low vs. high-likelihood protein targets, while the other approaches consider the contribution of each individual gene to the signature enrichment to be binary.
These approaches consider the whole connection patterns in the network.
Another set of approaches consider the concept of clustering of femtocells for the power adjustment.
Specifically, the probability density-based approaches consider the aggregated score distributions directly and thus yielded higher accuracies for verification.
The design optimization of different structural arrangements is obtained first with the proposed simplified approaches considering the platform heave motion.
In order to ease the reading, we group together similar approaches, considering the most important characteristics that define them.
None of the approaches considers the actual joint distribution of benefit and harm outcomes, but one approach considers competing risks when calculating profile-specific event rates.
Given the wide range of approaches considered, the consensus method may be considered the current performance of the network itself for determining gene disease associations.
The first approach: consider the standard matrix units { E i, j | 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n } in M n ( K ).
