The phrase "approaches and compared" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a fragment and lacks proper grammatical structure.
Example: "The study approaches and compares different methodologies to analyze the data."
Alternatives: "methods and comparisons" or "approaches and evaluations".
We have implemented both approaches and compared their relative performances in different scenarios.
Using the experimental strain measurements as input data, the deflection field of the plate is reconstructed using the three aforementioned approaches and compared with the actual measured deflection.
The glass transition temperature is estimated from the spin probe data, within various approaches, and compared to the results obtained by differential scanning calorimetry.
We then scaled this estimate to a monthly period using four approaches and compared the result with the observed monthly integral.
As miRNA analysis is a fast changing research field, we have introduced novel technological approaches and compared them to existing qPCR profiling methodologies.
In this work we calculated maps of movement artifacts using various approaches and compared maps across three different datasets to assess the variability between different populations and acquisition parameters.
We describe both the complete and a simplified approaches, and compare their merits and drawbacks.
Numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of proposed approaches and compare the conservativeness of two approaches.
We address the limitation of both approaches and compare them by means of a case study.
Kaplan and Chen (2014) also assessed the predictive performance of both Bayesian model averaging propensity score approaches and compare it to the case without Bayesian model averaging.
Subsequently, we assess the methodological limitations, discuss the results with regard to strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches and compare them to recent REDD policy developments.
