Sentence examples for approach when tested from inspiring English sources

The predictive capability of the proposed method is found to be superior to the popular strain-based Smith Watson Topper (SWT) approach when tested on some of the published experimental data.

In doing so, we explore whether such explicit modeling of variability provides any performance advantage over a more conventional fuzzy approach, when tested on a set of 1310 unselected cases collected over a fourteen year period at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

In addition, when c and s were set as 0.7 and 0.5, we also observed the best recall rates obtained by our approach when tested on three pathway databases (Supplementary Figs S3, S4 and S5).

We therefore additionally stress the importance of applying an experimental approach when testing the efficacy of conservation tools.

These differences were significant in spite of the conservative approach when testing.

For the superiority endpoints the ITT analysis will be given primacy, however for the non-inferiority endpoints equal weighting will be given to both the ITT analysis and the per-protocol analysis, as the ITT is likely to be the least conservative approach when testing for non-inferiority.

To compare the performance of different approaches when tested on negative data, we found that all approaches achieves the negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% if tested on randomized pathway data sets, further suggesting better performance of our approach at the same level of NPV.

Specific descriptors have also been employed [48] with a set of soft biometric algorithms for predicting the age, race, and gender of the subject whose facial features are analyzed, and the approach offers high accuracy when tested on two publicly available databases.

This approach has shown promise when tested in the context of defined regulatory elements in cell culture [ 29], viral vectors [ 30, 31] and transgenic assays in mammalian systems [ 32].

Animals approached the object faster when tested with an unrelated partner rather than with a sibling (Table A13), however, relatedness did not influence contact latency (Table A14).

Our approach achieves a PPV of 12.8%, indicating that our approach outperforms the other methods when tested on Reactome (Fig. 3).