The phrase "approach was selected for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the choice of a particular method or strategy for a specific purpose or project.
Example: "After careful consideration, the approach was selected for its effectiveness in addressing the issue at hand."
Alternatives: "method was chosen for" or "strategy was adopted for".
This approach was selected for materials that obey von Mises yield criteria.
The L-LSP approach was selected for the AROMA testbed since it provides the required functionalities with better control over the MPLS suite software.
After discussion with the orthopaedic surgeon, a posterior approach was selected for the biopsy with a 16-G cutting needle and the lesion proved to be a chordoma.
Therefore, a focus group approach was selected for preparation of an interview guide to address the essential issues later in the more thorough individual interviews for deductive analyses.
A dual approach was selected for the job and requirements analysis (Krumm et al. 2012): Following a "bottom up" approach, respondents were asked to describe specific favorable and less favorable behavior in certain situations and, in the following evaluation, we concluded on the underlying competences on which these behaviors were based.
This approach was selected for two main reasons.
A two-fluid Eulerian approach is selected for modeling the aforementioned phenomena considering that gasoil are droplets dispersed in steam.
(The BP-VA approach is selected for performance comparison because the individual algorithms show strong performance. SC-EM is not included in this simulation, since it uses iterative EM other than the combination of greedy algorithms and sequential detection methods using graph structure).
All articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers and only those written in the English language, dealing with adult patients and with a stated therapeutic approach, were selected for the study.
Three methodological approaches were selected for evaluation in this study.
In order to compare the energy-dissipating capabilities of the absorber two approaches were selected for the same boundary conditions: a standard seat and seat with absorber mounted in the cab during the impact.
