It was found out that the normal application of Amaefuleʼs hydraulic flow unit approach using the relation of normalized porosity index (ϕ Z) versus reservoir quality index (RQI and FZII values at (ϕ Z) = 1 leads to deviation of predicted permeability from the measured one in case of scattered data of (ϕ Z-RQI) relation having a unit slope trend line.
Another approach considers a set of normalized indices and selects as quality output the minimum value among all of the normalized measures.
This would render difficult their identification using the EST-based approach unless comprehensive sequencing of normalized and subtracted cDNA libraries is used.
The spatiotemporally distributed lateral flows generated in real-time is computed by water balance approach accounting for catchment characteristics of normalized network area function, land use land cover classes, and soil textural classes; and hydro-meteorological variables of precipitation, soil moisture, minimum and maximum temperatures, wind speed, relative humidity, and solar radiation.
In the third evaluation approach, the coefficient of variation of normalized relative expression levels was calculated for candidate genes throughout each developmental series tested.
The effectiveness of these approaches is assessed in terms of normalized misalignment [26], which is defined as mathcal{M} = 10 ; text{log}_{10}left(frac{||underline{mathbf{h}}_{mathrm{k}} - underline{mathbf{h}}_{text{rr}}||_{2}^{2}}{||underline{mathbf{h}}_{mathrm{k}}||_{2}^{2}} right) (36).
TTIs related to Approach II were calculated from plots of normalized cumulative NDVI vs. growing degree day (GDD).
This impression is supported by formal analyses showing that no effects involving N approach statistical significance, although the effects of normalized time, classification, and their interaction are all quite significant.
That conclusion is supported by formal analyses showing that no effects involving N approach statistical significance, although the effects of normalized time, classification, and their interaction are all quite significant.
An example of this approach uses normalized quality measures (including uncertainty in finger positions, maximum force transmission ratio, grasp isotropy and stability), assigns weights according to the desired grasp properties, and then selects the grasp with the minimum value out of the normalized and weighted measures (Kim et al. 2004).
