Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The first approach is quicker than the others although the geometry is not the most accurate.
This approach is quicker than phylogenetic analysis, and gives similar results once whole genomes have been established.
Similar(58)
This approach is quick to set up, but is often slow to render, and can produce noisy reconstructions.
The proposed approach is quick in application, auditable and shares a common framework applicable in other phases of the design lifecycle (e.g. process design).
This elegant approach is quick, minimally invasive, does not carry risk of rejection, and has the potential to be relatively cost-effective.
Most authors who have embraced the evolutionary approach, are quick to point out that this approach avoids much of the criticism raised against the previous two approaches.
None of these approaches is quick.
Observational approaches are quicker and simpler compared with experimental methods and are the logical first step in studying potential invasion impacts.
We see in Figure 6 that, as expected, the EWMA and MA(4) approaches are quicker to detect outbreaks than the Shewhart approach when the outbreak is relatively small.
The all-ultrasonic approach is also quicker because the image can be examined directly by the operator of the zapper, rather than being laboriously constructed from multiple slices inside a computer.
Applying this approach is much quicker, less expensive and allows for a more comprehensive search for the most suitable candidates than working with experimental data alone.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com