Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "approach is inefficient" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the effectiveness of a method or strategy in a particular context, indicating that it does not yield optimal results.
Example: "After reviewing the current workflow, it is clear that the approach is inefficient and needs to be revised for better productivity."
Alternatives: "method is ineffective" or "strategy is suboptimal."
Exact(18)
The very fundamentals of the way we queue were questioned this month by Danish research suggesting the first-come-first-served approach is inefficient.
Such an approach is inefficient because it increases the size of every PA, not just the smaller ones.
The current fixed spectrum allocation approach is inefficient in resource utilization and hinders the freedom to dynamically exchange spectrum ownership and deploy new wireless services.
The second is that a brute-force ANOVA approach is inefficient when there are many variables.
This approach is inefficient because it often has to test a large number of itemsets.
Unfortunately, this approach is inefficient because it adds heavy load to the nodes due to the large number of tasks.
Similar(42)
Existing marketplaces based on first-come-first-serve (FCFS) approach are inefficient because they may not result in optimal matches.
In estimating data quality, the traditional approach of visual inspection at a limited number of sites (often previously well-characterized using low-throughput approaches) is inefficient, subjective, and ultimately can be deceptive.
Culture-based approaches are inefficient at recovering the uncultured viral majority1,3.
However, existing middleware solutions or approaches are inefficient as they search all solution spaces.
Although the body's assembly line of progesterone-building enzymes has been reproduced in the test tube and in mammalian cell culture, these approaches are inefficient and costly.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com