Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Update: A spokesman said: "We're not commenting on IP matters" — so it's unclear whether Rainbow's approach is defensible.
13 While this approach is defensible for a review article, one cannot avoid noticing the difference in characteristics between these prospectively studied populations and the non-selected population that cataract surgery centres handle in clinical practice.
Similar(57)
But Relan says that Crowdstar's approach is more defensible since it's highly focused on one demographic sliver of the market: young women.
But while such an approach is entirely defensible for an experimental system intended to illustrate the role of plans and intentions in a specialized domain, it leaves open the question of how large amounts of linguistic knowledge and world knowledge could be incorporated into a dialogue system, and used inferentially in planning communicative (and other) actions.
The pros and cons of that approach could be debated, but it is defensible.
This reluctance is defensible.
This execution is defensible.
Diversification in itself is defensible.
But the comparison is defensible.
From an economic perspective, this is defensible.
So what exactly is defensible here?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com