Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
This laboratory has developed a flow cytometric approach for scoring in vitro micronuclei (In Vitro MicroFlow®) whose characteristics are expected to benefit studies designed to comprehensively investigate genotoxicity dose response relationships.
We also compared our approach for scoring functional interactions from protein family and domain to the scoring scheme for protein signature profiling (SFSP).
We developed a novel statistical approach for scoring network nodes in the protein interaction network for their relevance to a disease phenotype or other condition of interest.
Requiring that a PPI be supported by several publications has been a common approach for scoring PPI data in public databases (25, 38), as it is easy to interpret and the bias toward well-studied interactions is immediately evident.
We have developed a proof-of-concept approach for scoring, and prioritizing putative drug drug-event associations basedrug drug-event of cmplementassociations across multiple sources.
Additionally, since each of the evaluating radiologists used a different approach for scoring, we do not have data about interobserver variability within the same approach.
Similar(52)
While many other more sophisticated approaches for scoring sequences are possible, these are left for future research.
Furthermore, conventional approaches for scoring genotoxicity endpoints are slow, tedious, and less objective than what would be considered ideal.
Given the poor performance of previously developed prediction scores, an alternative approach for score development was investigated by considering original variables individually rather than scoring them before including them in the equations.
It uses the lexicon-based approach for sentiment scoring.
As one is to expect a slightly higher false positive rate, one also can expect a much lower false negative rate with the novel approach we have taken for scoring HMMerThread hits.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com