The phrase "approach estimates a" is not correct and does not form a coherent expression in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete thought and lacks clarity, making it unusable without additional context.
Example: "The approach estimates a significant increase in productivity over the next quarter."
Alternatives: "method predicts a" or "strategy forecasts a".
In addition to currently used methods of exposure assessment, our approach estimates a concentration time profile for each subject, taking into account mean residence time of PCB 153 molecules in the body, duration of breast feeding, hypothetical PCB 153 concentration in steady-state without breast feeding and alternately without normal food intake.
But the new approach estimates a return to full sprinting within five months, a choice he described as a "no-brainer".
This approach estimates a mix of two effects: The effect on the hiring decision of a firm and the effect on labour market outcomes once the hiring has taken place.
This approach estimates a quantitative measure for the PFM similarity of two proteins, based on various features derived from their protein sequences.
The core of our approach estimates a P-Shift score for each tumor sample and for each FG using two runs of the original PARADIGM algorithm (Fig. 2).
The main differences between the two methods is that the human capital approach estimates a potential value of lost production due to absenteeism or death, whereas the friction cost method suggests that the production losses might be smaller.
This approach estimates an effective ground thermal conductivity representing an average of the thermal conductivity of the different layers crossed by perforation.
This approach estimates an overall effect by computing a weighted average of the country-specific estimates.
Our RAD-based approach estimates an R Z A for each individual bird.
The TEF approach estimates an equivalent combination dose using the concentrations and relative potencies of individual congeners, but it ignores differences in maximal effects, thereby failing to account for the competition of partial agonists for receptor sites.
