Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
However, the conclusion that exposures at or below this level would not result in appreciable health risks is typically not based on further quantitative substantiation.
Ford's story is mostly substantiated indirectly, but it does have substantiation.
Data Integrity and Substantiation.
But he offered little substantiation.
Both depictions, however, lack credible substantiation.
And it's all appreciable.
They have no appreciable gravity.
Your inputs would be appreciable.
Other bits of substantiation are even less plausible.
To make such assertions without substantiation is irresponsible.
That is obviously not an appreciable decline.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com