Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "appraising tool for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific instrument or method used to evaluate or assess something.
Example: "The new appraising tool for real estate valuation has significantly improved our accuracy in pricing properties."
Alternatives: "evaluation instrument for" or "assessment tool for".
Exact(2)
We did not assess quality of the included studies due to a lack of an established and validated critical appraising tool for the expected study designs.
We did not assess quality of the included studies due to a lack of an established and validated critical appraising tool for the included study designs.
Similar(58)
Articles reporting on the tools reviewed by Sutton et al 1 were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) critical appraisal tool for cohort studies 17 (see Table 2 for CASP scores).
The availability of so many critical appraisal tools (for instance [ 6]) may well prove daunting for allied health practitioners who are learning to critically appraise research in their area of interest.
In a potential milestone for ocean management, a team of collaborators has produced the first Ocean Health Index, a tool for appraising the state of the world's oceans.
The purpose of this paper is to introduce the Comparative Single-Case Experimental Design Rating System (CSCEDARS, "cedars") as a tool for appraising the internal validity of comparative SCEDs of two or more non-reversible instructional interventions.
The QHES is a practical quantitative tool for appraising the quality of cost-effectiveness studies.
This health economic model offers a powerful tool for appraising non-drug interventions in the market and under development.
The DREEM is undoubtedly a useful tool for appraising the educational climate in medical education and its widespread international use reveals the need for such a device.
The SCI has potential as a clinical screening tool for appraising insomnia symptoms against Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria.
We have applied these standards to the above-mentioned review [ 3] using AMSTAR, a structured, validated tool for appraising the methodological quality of reviews [ 7].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com