Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Two hundred and twenty five articles published in the press from 2000 to 2007 and 78 documents targeted to women were extracted from available sources (publisher's archives or search engines in internet) and appraised using a standardized form dealing with graphic layout, editing, transparency of information, contents related to menopause and HRT.
Similar(59)
The methodological quality of these articles was appraised using a standard tool.
All studies were reviewed and critically appraised using a structured template.
All included studies were critically appraised using a standardised checklist.
Qualitative studies were appraised using a quality checklist (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009).
These papers were quality appraised using a modified Crombie tool.
Systematic reviews were quality appraised using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).
In addition, the quality of each review was appraised using a validated tool [ 16].
Study quality was appraised using a modified BMJ checklist for economic evaluations.
Randomised studies were appraised using a modified version of the Jadad score [ 27].
RPPs were appraised using a tool specifically designed by a Scientific Committee appointed by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com