Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Study quality was appraised using a mixed methods research scoring system developed by Kmet, which proposes assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields (see additional file 2).
Similar(59)
All studies were reviewed and critically appraised using a structured template.
The methodological quality of these articles was appraised using a standard tool.
All included studies were critically appraised using a standardised checklist.
Qualitative studies were appraised using a quality checklist (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009).
These papers were quality appraised using a modified Crombie tool.
Study quality was appraised using a modified BMJ checklist for economic evaluations.
RPPs were appraised using a tool specifically designed by a Scientific Committee appointed by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Systematic reviews were quality appraised using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).
In addition, the quality of each review was appraised using a validated tool [ 16].
Randomised studies were appraised using a modified version of the Jadad score [ 27].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com