Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(3)
The phrase "appraised by using a" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the method or tool used to evaluate or assess something.
Example: "The property was appraised by using a professional valuation service to determine its market value."
Alternatives: "evaluated through a" or "assessed with a".
Exact(3)
The measurement precision is appraised by using a tool-room microscopy.
In the first sift titles and abstracts were screened; in the second sift papers were obtained and screened if they met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; in the third sift papers were critically appraised by using a checklist [ 7].
A study was excluded if the intervention included any form of medication or drug use; it was assessed as not being relevant to the general context; and it had an unacceptable quality, appraised by using a checklist previously used by The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care [ 7].
Similar(57)
Each study was critically appraised by using data extraction sheets, critical appraisal forms, and evidence sheets based on NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance.
All the included trials were of high quality when appraised by using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials [ 8].
The quality of included trials was appraised by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, which assesses sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, data completeness, and outcome reporting, and, on the basis of these domains, summarizes studies as exhibiting a low, high, or unclear risk of bias.
Papers were independently appraised by two authors (KV, CB) in terms of their methodology and design by using a predetermined protocol and graded as to the level of evidence (table 1 and 2).
Each review was critically appraised by two authors using a study appraisal tool and were given a quality assessment rating of weak, moderate or strong.
Papers were read independently and appraised using a standardised checklist by two researchers, with differences being resolved by consensus [ J Epidemiol Community Health, 52 377 384, 1998].
RPPs were appraised using a tool specifically designed by a Scientific Committee appointed by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Sixty-eight studies were critically appraised by two reviewers using a set of criteria [11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com