Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The methodological quality of the studies was appraised using the "appraisal of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials" developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute.
The remaining papers were appraised using relevant appraisal checklists for the type of study under consideration, following which 16 papers were excluded.
Studies were critically appraised using the CASP appraisal tool.
The quality of included cohort studies was appraised using the standard critical appraisal questions developed by the Centre for Clinical Effectiveness.
Articles reporting on the tools reviewed by Sutton et al 1 were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) critical appraisal tool for cohort studies 17 (see Table 2 for CASP scores).
Twelve publications were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.
Each citation was appraised using screening tools designed and tested a priori.
The methodological quality of these articles was appraised using a standard tool.
The validity of the quantitative data findings has been appraised using qualitative data collected in ten exploratory interviews.
In addition, applicability of the schedules was appraised using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design FADD) to determine earliness and tardiness penalty costs.
The reliability and the bond strength of wire bonding electronic packages are appraised using wire bond shear test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com