Sentence examples for appraise studies from inspiring English sources
The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) critical appraisal tool, 16 which is a validated tool specifically developed to appraise studies assessing the accuracy of diagnostic tools for systematic reviews, was used to appraise the articles on the development of a new tool (See Table 1 for QUADAS scores).
To critically appraise studies comparing benefits and harms in women with benign disease without prolapse undergoing hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) versus laparoscopy.
We review and critically appraise studies suggesting higher levels of insecure attachment, and dismissing attachment in particular, in samples with psychosis compared to controls.
In this systematic review, we used systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise studies, and to extract data, analyzing them with a meta-analysis.
We employed explicit and systematic methods to identify, select and critically appraise studies, and to extract data followed by a meta-analysis.
Some reviews previously assessed this topic, but always in a narrative and subjective way, not using systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise studies, and to extract data, and to analyse them with statistical methods [11 15].
To identify and appraise study findings on the use of mobile devices, in particular for what purposes and how, in nursing student nurse teacher cooperation during the clinical practicum.
Second, as meta-analysis is only as valid as studies included, it is undeniably important to appraise study quality.
In our study, the abilities to formulate a clear question, retrieve relevant literature, critical appraise study findings have improved significantly.
10 The Center for Reviews and Dissemination and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommend the use of checklists to appraise study quality.
Box 1 Criteria used to appraise study quality* Criterion (with guidance for reviewers) Were steps taken to increase rigour in the sampling?
