Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In addition to technical skills, the language gap between laypersons and professionals regarding medical concepts makes it difficult to search and appraise content (Zeng and Tse 2006).
Similar(59)
Study 1 appraised content validity using five sport scientists as judges to quantify the quality of the adaptation for each item; then the Content Validity Coefficient was calculated.
CV Participated in the design of the manuscript, helped draft, revise and critically appraise manuscript content.
SN contributed to revising the article and critically appraising the content.
CYH contributed to interpret the data, revising the article and critically appraising the content.
HJM contributed to appraising the content and the writing of the report.
EV contributed to drafting and revising of the article and critically appraising the content.
SE contributed to drafting and revising of the article and critically appraising the content.
JMcL contributed to drafting, revising the article and critically appraising the content.
He contributed to the design, revision of both the original and the resubmitted article and critically appraising the content.
MA contributed to design the work and interpret the data, revising the article and critically appraising the content.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com