Sentence examples for appraise and evaluate the from inspiring English sources

The aim of this study was to critically appraise and evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of cactus pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI), using data from published randomized clinical trials.

Based on the results of the literature review, the researchers will appraise and evaluate the currently employed forecasting and planning models.

The UK Foundation Programme Committee [ 2] states that trainee doctors should be able to understand, critically appraise and evaluate the evidence base for medical practice and implement available evidence into clinical care.

In such cases – where hundreds of published studies exist on an issue – systematic reviews are typically performed to formulate precise questions and to consolidate, appraise and evaluate the evidence to facilitate decision making by clinicians and policy makers.

As EBM essentially uses data from clinical research to identify, select, appraise and evaluate the yield of medical interventions, its value and contribution is essentially related to the availability and quality of data made available through the process presented and discussed above.

We appraise the effect of polyploidy and evaluate the existence of intraspecific variation based on the number and distribution of GC-rich bands and rDNA loci.

EBP is often described as a process consisting of distinct activities including, formulating questions, searching for information, compiling the appraised information, implementing evidence, and evaluating the resulting practice.

The five steps of EBM (formulating clinical question, searching for evidence, appraising the evidence, applying the evidence, and evaluating the outcome of implementation).

The current study was appraised to evaluate the influence of beneficial bacteria (A.

Recent draft NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal (2007) suggests the QUADAS quality assessment tool "as a useful starting point for appraising studies that evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a test" but no guidance is provided on quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies.

The recent draft NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal (2007) suggests QUADAS "as a useful starting point for appraising studies that evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a test" but does not mention how to quality assess diagnostic or therapeutic yield studies, in particular diagnostic before-after studies.