appoint with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "appoint with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not a commonly used expression and may lead to confusion regarding its intended meaning. Example: "I would like to appoint with you a time to discuss the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

The trust looked for a deputy chief executive but failed to appoint; with hindsight that looks like a critical failure.

The Guardian

DICKERSON: So, Senator Cruz, the Constitution says the president "shall appoint with advice and consent from the Senate," just to clear that up.

The Washington Post

Advisers to the NSC are the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and other officials whom the president may appoint with Senate approval.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He may also nominate and appoint, with the consent of the Senate, judges of the inferior courts whose jurisdiction is only within one municipality.

Wikipedia

On 23 December 1248, he was also authorised by the Pope to appoint, with the agreement of the Bishop of Glasgow, a new bishop for Argyll.

Wikipedia

Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution authorizes the president to appoint, "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," all federal judges.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

I have also appointed with other primary and adjunct faculty appointments in ECE and BME in the past.

Stanford University

Rooms, often appointed with chandeliers, start at 450 Swiss francs.

The New York Times - Travel

The upper floor is appointed with weirdly ornate Soviet chandeliers.

The Economist

Its nine rooms are appointed with a subtle nautical touch.

The New York Times - Travel

Superbly appointed with impeccable attention to detail and understated elegance.

The Guardian - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to appointments, specify the type of appointment (e.g., medical, legal, business) for better context.

Common error

A common mistake is using "with" after "appoint" when referring to scheduling. Instead, use prepositions like "for" or rephrase to "schedule an appointment with" for grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "appoint with" is not a standard grammatical construction in English. Typically, "appoint" is used to assign a role or position, not to schedule a meeting. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is not correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Academia

38%

Encyclopedias

13%

Less common in

Wiki

13%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "appoint with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. The intended meaning is usually to schedule a meeting or assign a role, but "appoint with" is not the standard way to express this. Instead, opt for clearer alternatives such as "schedule an appointment with" or rephrase your sentence to use "appoint" in the context of assigning a position (e.g., "The president will appoint a new judge"). While it appears in some online sources, its frequency is low and its usage is generally discouraged.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Schedule an appointment with

Replaces "appoint" with the more common "schedule an appointment", clarifying the action as arranging a specific time.

Arrange a meeting with

Similar to scheduling, but emphasizes setting up a meeting rather than a general appointment.

Set up a consultation with

Specifies the purpose as a consultation, implying a discussion for advice or expertise.

Nominate in conjunction with

Focuses on the act of nominating someone, adding the element of doing it together or in agreement with someone else.

Designate along with

Highlights the act of designating someone and that this is done together or simultaneously with others.

Assign in collaboration with

Emphasizes assigning a task or role while working together with someone.

Appoint in agreement with

This highlights that the act of appointing is done with someone's consent or approval.

Name together with

Focuses on the act of naming a person alongside others, often for a specific purpose.

Select jointly with

Highlights the action of selecting someone, specifying that it's a mutual decision or process.

Appoint with the approval of

Clarifies that the appointment requires and has received the necessary approval from another party.

FAQs

What's a grammatically correct alternative to "appoint with"?

Instead of "appoint with", use phrases like "schedule an appointment with", "arrange a meeting with", or "set up a consultation with" to ensure correct usage.

Is "appoint with" considered formal or informal language?

"Appoint with" is not considered standard English. It's best to avoid it in both formal and informal contexts. Use clearer and more accepted phrases for better communication.

How can I use "appoint" correctly in a sentence?

Use "appoint" to indicate assigning a role or position, as in "The president will appoint a new judge." Avoid using "with" after "appoint" in this context. If you intend to refer to scheduling, you can use alternatives like "schedule an appointment with".

What is the difference between "appoint" and "schedule an appointment"?

"Appoint" means to assign a role or position. "Schedule an appointment" means to set a time for a meeting or consultation. They have different meanings and usages.