appoint on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "appoint on" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It is typically incorrect because "appoint" is usually followed by "to" or "as" rather than "on." Example: "The board decided to appoint John to the position of manager."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The deputy Labour leader, Harriet Harman, recently wrote to Javid asking the government to appoint on merit rather than politics.

The Guardian

Schools that do not appoint on their first or second attempt often feel their only option is to bring in a recruitment firm.

The Guardian

There are many suitable candidates – just so long as Mr Javid is prepared to do the right thing, and appoint on merit.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is understood that the club board will put their faith in a manager of proven experience when they appoint on a permanent basis at the end of the season.

Independent

But the suggestion the club's hierarchy are keen to discuss Terry's future with the candidate they appoint on a permanent basis in the summer is understood to have frustrated the 35-year-old, who is free to negotiate a deal with a foreign club for the end of the campaign.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Each chapter has a chairperson appointed on a one-year rotating basis from one of its member countries.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The 40-year-old was appointed on a rolling one-year deal by the Championship club last month.

BBC

The most senior officials in each department - the permanent secretaries - would be appointed on five-year "fixed-tenure appointments".

BBC

McLeish was appointed on 27 December but only won one game out of seven and lost four of those matches.

BBC

Lord Grabiner is a new entry as its chair – appointed on Monday – but don't expect this one to soar.

The Guardian - Opinion

The foreign editor was appointed "on the basis of an essay he'd written on one of the Brontë sisters".

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "appoint on". Use "appoint to" or "appoint as" instead to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity. For example, "The board decided to appoint her to the committee" or "They appointed him as the new director".

Common error

A common mistake is using "on" after "appoint". Always remember that "appoint" typically requires "to" or "as" to correctly indicate the position or role being assigned. Using "appoint on" can lead to confusion and is considered grammatically incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "appoint on" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, it is typically incorrect because "appoint" is usually followed by "to" or "as" rather than "on". Its intended function would be to describe the act of assigning someone to a role or position, but it fails to do so effectively due to the improper preposition.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "appoint on" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct usage involves using "appoint to" or "appoint as" to ensure clarity and adherence to standard English grammar. While it appears in a limited number of contexts, primarily within News & Media, its incorrectness makes it unsuitable for formal or professional communication. When assigning someone to a role, it is always best to use the grammatically correct alternatives, such as "appoint to" or "appoint as".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Appoint to

This is the standard and grammatically correct construction when assigning someone to a position.

Appoint as

This is also a grammatically correct construction, indicating the role or capacity in which someone is being appointed.

Select for

Focuses on the act of choosing someone for a specific purpose or role.

Assign to

Emphasizes the act of giving someone a task or responsibility.

Designate as

Highlights the official or formal nature of the appointment.

Nominate for

Suggests a preliminary step before a formal appointment.

Choose for

A more general term for selecting someone.

Elect to

Implies a voting process or democratic selection.

Recruit for

Focuses on the process of finding and attracting suitable candidates.

Induct into

Suggests a formal introduction or acceptance into an organization or group.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "appoint" in a sentence?

The verb "appoint" is typically followed by "to" or "as", depending on the context. For example, "The governor appointed her "to the board"" or "They appointed him "as chairman"".

Is "appoint on" grammatically correct?

No, "appoint on" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct usage involves using "appoint to" or "appoint as".

What can I use instead of "appoint on"?

Use "appoint to" when assigning someone to a position or role, and "appoint as" when specifying the capacity in which they are being appointed. Alternatives include phrases like "assign to" or "designate as".

Which is correct, "appoint to" or "appoint as"?

Both "appoint to" and "appoint as" are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Appoint to" is used to indicate the specific position or role someone is being assigned to, while "appoint as" specifies the capacity or function in which they will serve.