The phrase "applying this argument" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the implementation or use of a specific argument in a logical or persuasive context.
Example: "In our discussion, applying this argument will help clarify our position on the issue."
Alternatives: "utilizing this argument" or "employing this argument".
But applying this argument to Ukraine or Uganda is a scare tactic.
Applying this argument to the pharmaceutical industry regulation could in principle reduce the development of so called "me-too drugs" (i.e. drugs that are structurally very similar to already known drugs with only minor benefits to the patients) while maintaining or even increasing the number of break through innovations.
Applying this argument to our findings, it could be that expecting conflict on the basis of a conflict-predicting cue results in further increased instead of decreased conflict, because one is not able to a priori suppress spatial attention when the conflicting stimulus location is unknown.
Let is be said that to this day, many on the left and center-left remain critical of Kirkpatrick's efforts to distinguish between "totalitarian" regimes and "non-Communist autocracies". Many liberals still disagree with the way in which Kirkpatrick applied this argument to defend Reagan's Central America policies, and they still object to her broad-brush attacks on opponents to her left.
It is here proposed to apply this argument to inorganic as well as to organic nontransient irreversible processes, which proceed wholly or nearly isothermally and in which the product has a higher degree of order or of organization than the initial states.
In his (1868), Boltzmann set out to apply this argument to a variety of other models (including gases in a static external force field).
end{aligned} (9.21 Finally, in the general case, first apply this argument to (mathcal {C}' rightarrow I), and note that the equivalence (9.19) for (mathcal {C}') induces the equivalence (9.19) for (mathcal {C}), while (9.21) descends to the required adjoint functor.
Thaler, a professor of economics at the University of Chicago, and Sunstein, a law professor formerly at Chicago but now at Harvard, apply this line of argument to a wide array of familiar areas: saving, borrowing, energy consumption,smoking, teenage pregnancy and many others.
Applying this result and an induction argument on the dimension N, we extend uniqueness results of Bénilan, Kruzhkov (1996, Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl.3, 395 419) for flux having some monotonicity properties.
If the increment and/or reduction is applied on this argument as well, the translator will get the extended form.
