Applying the same cut offs, a total 75.9% of the AusDiab population had diabetes ruled in or ruled out (Fig. 1 B), while the remaining 24.1% had impaired A1C.
It is also believed that applying the same cut-off used in other studies provides a common reference level for comparison.
We applied the same cut-off for insertion/deletion correction of the reference genome sequence.
We applied the same cut-off for the generic SF-36 outcome measure as for the KOOS.
To classify samples as methylated, we applied the same cut-off used by Xing et al. [ 10].
We arbitrarily applied the same cut-off for clinically relevant change for the generic SF-36 as for the knee-specific measure KOOS.
To classify samples as "methylated", we applied the same cut-off used for qMSP (an average methylation level higher than 20%).
We also applied the same cut-off points as Roberts et al. for the number of previous and recent traumatic event exposure (cut-off points were eight and four events, respectively) and hence treated exposure to traumatic event as a dichotomized variable.
Children were tested for APL similarly to the mothers and the same cut-offs were applied to children.
If the same cut-off was applied for the parent reports, 22% of the mothers and 16% of the fathers rated their child in the clinical range.
The same cut-offs were applied in Limma after considering Tempranillo skin and flesh samples for the same time point as replicates to identify transcripts with consistent oscillation in expression along the pericarp.
