Sentence examples for apply to arbitration from inspiring English sources
The phrase "apply to arbitration" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used in legal or contractual contexts when referring to the process of submitting a dispute to arbitration for resolution. Example: "The parties agreed to apply to arbitration to resolve their contractual disputes."
American Express claims that prohibitive costs do not apply to arbitration or litigation costs, but instead only to "filing fees, arbitrator's fees, and other administrative fees imposed by the arbitral forum that would not be required to sue in court". See id. at 41.
They apply to arbitration.
However, this policy does not apply to arbitration hearings or for time off strictly for union matters.
Other formula one sources have suggested that the FIA has a vendetta against McLaren and Williams as they were the two teams to apply to arbitration at the International Chamber of Commerce in Lausanne at the start of the season, claiming that the way in which the FIA president Max Mosley altered the regulations in an attempt to improve racing for spectators was a breach of the FIA's own rules.
American Express argues that the effective vindication rule only applies to arbitration terms that would override substantive federal law.
The legislation would make clear that sex discrimination law applied to arbitration tribunals and any evidence of sexism was "a serious irregularity".
The bill, which will apply to all arbitration tribunals if passed, aims to tackle discrimination, which its supporters say is inherent in the courts, by banning the sharia practice of giving woman's testimony only half the weight of men's.
Thirdly, the UK has issued its own unilateral declaration, asserting that it will apply to the independent arbitration panel to dismantle the backstop provisions if the government believes the EU is not making efforts to end the arrangement.
In contrast, "courts uniformly have concluded that Wilko does not apply to the submission to arbitration of existing disputes". Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 233, 107 S.Ct.
This interpretation means that the prohibitive costs of arbitration only apply to the basic costs of arbitration above and beyond court costs.
But Richard Reibstein, a New York attorney who specializes in defending companies in misclassification suits, said the Supreme Court decision only applies to federal arbitration law, since state arbitration laws generally do not include an exception for transportation workers.
