The phrase "application of resilience" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing how resilience is implemented or utilized in various situations, such as personal development, organizational strategies, or psychological practices.
Example: "The application of resilience in the workplace can lead to improved employee well-being and productivity."
Alternatives: "utilization of resilience" or "implementation of resilience".
Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom are chosen as examples since they show similarities and differences regarding the application of resilience and vulnerability.
In recent years, the concept transition from fail-safe to safe-to-fail makes the application of resilience analysis popular in urban drainage systems (UDSs) with various implications and quantifications.
This is a novel application of resilience training; to promote heart health by focusing on identified CHD risk factors of depression, poor social support and life stress.
A great deal has been written about resilience, and some interesting and useful concepts have come out of the effort, though admittedly the development and application of resilience thinking have been uneven across disciplines.
The articles in this special issue address these questions and feature current applications of resilience and vulnerability research, practice, and policy with relevance to disaster risk management.
Regarding the potential applications of resilience and vulnerability concepts, we mainly consider risk reduction measures, risk management plans and actions, and climate change adaptation measures in this article.
Given the recognition of the need to prepare for anticipated and unanticipated shocks, applications of resilience are increasing as the guiding principle of public policy and programs in areas such as disaster management, urban planning, natural resource management, and climate change adaptation.
The application of the resilience engineering perspective is gradually being explored as an approach for considering the dynamics of socio-technical aspects based on systems theory to provide a safety net.
These advancements should contribute greatly to the application of spatial resilience strategies in general, and to sustainable anthropogenic landscapes management in particular, and for the spatially explicit adaptive comanagement of ecosystem services.
This imposes problems in the application and operationalization of resilience and vulnerability.
The application of the spatial resilience index would contribute to an objective assessment of the ecological quality of the agricultural landscape, a basic requirement for the perception of environmental subsidies by farmers from different administrations.
