The phrase "applicant selection" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to hiring processes, recruitment, or any situation where individuals are being chosen for a position or opportunity.
Example: "The applicant selection process will begin next week, and we encourage all qualified candidates to apply."
Alternatives: "candidate selection" or "applicant evaluation".
The key challenges faced and areas where facilitating factors have been identified can be classified as follows: 1) applicant selection; 2) application and admission procedures; 3) supervisor student responsibilities; 4) training curriculum; 5) cultural considerations; 6) budget and funding; and 7) dissemination.
Obtaining this information may help answer the question of whether applicants to general surgery have already self-selected themselves based on their learning style or whether the applicant selection committee is responsible for such selection.
Ophthalmology should strive to develop applicant selection tools that might be useful for predicting residency performance and that would align with the ACGME competency mandate for tools to predict future performance as a physician.
Based on the decisions of our fuzzy expert system, automatic applicant selection procedure will be able to distinct between candidates that do not meet the mandatory criteria and candidates that are suitable for a vacant technical position and will be invited for an interview.
However, our findings suggest that the opinions of experienced faculty should be regarded as a valuable asset deserving of consideration on the list of criteria for residency applicant selection.
A second extension requires that public sector jobs other than those reserved for elected officials along with their staffs—should be open to all applicants with selection of applicants being made on the basis of the merits of the applications.
An extrapolation of results for different proportions of selected applicants (no selection at all, proportions of ¾, of ½, and of ¼) gave following results: The expected success rate increases from 70.1% to values between 74.1% and 85.5%, depending on the selected proportion and the specific predictor used (Table 4).
Even though for a part of the applicants, the selection committee did not correctly estimate the applicant's future performance, the results show a statistically significant association between selection decisions and the applicants' scientific achievements, if quantity and impact of research publications are used as a criterion for scientific achievement.
For example, an autocratic society, in which economic life is organized by the commands of the autocrat, could satisfy equality of opportunity to this extent: the post of autocrat is open to all applicants, and selection is determined by the fitness of applicants for autocratic performance as indicated by the comparative merits of their applications.
BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said they would aim at a "level playing field" between local applicants for selection and union-backed opponents.
115 applicants met selection criteria and of these 101 were able to be contacted by phone.
