Sentence examples for applicable table from inspiring English sources

Not applicable Table 4 Assessment of "B" Scenarios (compared with A-1 Scenario) Scenario Criteria category European models Regional models ASTRA SASI Brussels Dortmund Edingburgh Helsinki South Tyrol No policies B1 Energy +++ n.a.a

Tumors were classified following the WHO classification [1] and the Sainte-Anne Hospital classification [35] when applicable (Table 1).

Direct PCR reactions were carried out with different primer combinations and, when applicable (Table 1), 1 µl of the first PCR reaction carried out with the most external primers (27F and 1492R) was then used in nested PCR reaction using the same conditions with primers 63F and 1387R.

The overall Kappa coefficient was қ = 0.88 (141 of 185 cases applicable; Table 2).

† n.a = not applicable Table 4 shows the percentage of referrals that had occurred if the UKCG or the WHO criteria would have been used.

This systematic process demonstrated that most of the broad procedures and techniques of both IPT and CBT were cross-culturally applicable (Table 3).

The appropriate values for the ICW and coefficient for the constant back-off algorithm are then to be chosen dynamically from Table 3 (note that for RFID-systems where Table 1 values not are applicable, Tables 3 5 values need to be regenerated).

To set the significance threshold, we computed the mean for each family and the residual value from the family mean for each rat and repeated the linkage analysis in the residual data set (indicated in parenthesis in applicable tables) [28].

Additional analyses that may be conducted, if applicable (tables not shown): instrumental variables regressions to adjust for potential unmeasured confounders, hierarchical models to address clustering, and sensitivity analyses with different suboutcomes (time to ED visit, time to hospitalisation, time to death, time to ADE).

Table with subgroup analyses (if applicable) Grade tables For each test the tables will state the number of studies, design, limitations, test results with outcomes important to patients, the indirectness of the impact of the test result on patient-important outcomes, the precision of the data, publication bias and an assessment of the overall quality of the evidence.

When applicable, this table also shows the differences in practical applications between the text-text and video-text intervention.