The phrase "applicable risks" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing risks that are relevant or pertinent to a specific situation or context.
Example: "Before proceeding with the project, we need to assess the applicable risks to ensure we are prepared for any potential issues."
Alternatives: "relevant risks" or "pertinent risks".
Concentrations of Al, Ba, Cr, Fe, Mo, Na, Ni, Sb, and Sr measured using batch leaching tests exceeded applicable risk-based thresholds on at least some occasions, but the concentrations measured suggest that risk to water supplies should be controlled because of dilution and attenuation.
As Chinese Asian populations have an increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA), we aimed to design a rapid, clinically applicable risk scoring system to predict ICH and functional outcomes after IV tPA treatment in Asian ischemic stroke patients.
The final model was used to derive a simple and clinically applicable risk score.
Clinically applicable risk models are developed to generate individualized molecular scores to identify distinctive risk groups.
We assigned each risk of bias domain as "low risk," "probably low risk," "probably high risk," "high risk," or "not applicable" (risk of bias area not applicable to the study).
The following data were extracted for each recommendation: efficacy: progression-free survival (PFS) gain efficacy: overall survival (OS) gain incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) recommendation reason for negative recommendation (if applicable) arrangements between payers and manufacturers (if applicable: risk-sharing, price negotiation, access scheme).
For each analysis, 1000 Monte-Carlo micro-simulations were performed and joint parameter uncertainty introduced by random sampling of transition probabilities and, if applicable, risk-adjustment variables from a triangular or uniform distribution of parameters between confidence intervals or ranges [ 26].
Table 1 contains descriptive statistics for a subset of variables that were included in an inferential analysis based on the time of PCVAD outbreaks (in case herds) and on time of selection as a time-matched control (in the applicable risk set).
NA=not applicable; 0=low risk; 1=high risk or uncertain.
They concluded that Rb is a reliable method in comparison to O-water PET and that Rb may be applicable for risk assessment in subjects with coronary risk factors.
