The phrase "applicable objective" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an objective that is relevant or suitable for a particular situation or context.
Example: "In order to achieve success, we must focus on the applicable objective that aligns with our current goals."
Alternatives: "relevant goal" or "pertinent aim".
Accordingly, there is growing need for an applicable objective test that represents aided thresholds and cortical processing of amplified sounds.
The absence of clinically applicable objective measurement tools to assess the presence or estimate the intensity of this subjective auditory perception impairs research and has repercussions on health and legal systems.
However, it is clearly not possible to find a universally applicable objective function that would give highest numerical scores to the biologically correct alignments in all possible situations.
Level 1 instruments are supported by established inter-rater reliability (if applicable), objective (non-self-reported) outcome measures, and multiple (≥ 3) types of established validity evidence (including evidence of discriminative validity).
They are supported by established inter-rater reliability (if applicable), objective (non-self-reported) outcome measures, and multiple (≥ 3) types of established validity evidence (including evidence of discriminative validity).
The applicable objectives are minimizing the power consumption, accordingly, minimizing the overall cost of ventilation.
The worst-load-direction-oriented minimax-compliance-model provides expressive, rigorous, generally applicable, and objective information about the robustness.
On the other hand, this suggests that the VEP amplitude and latency are applicable to objective assessments of refractive errors [ 9, 10].
Although en bloc excision is desirable for tumorous lesions if applicable, the objective of endoscopic treatment for adenomas is elimination of the lesion; however, complete en bloc excision is required for total excisional biopsy of carcinomatous lesions.
At the end of the 6-month follow-up period, patients were asked to repeat the HR-QOL and clinical status questionnaires and information was collected about any treatment combinations and the reasons for withdrawal, where applicable; the objective severity of the condition was re-evaluated using the PASI score, and the pain and itching VAS scores were used to acquire a subjective evaluation.
Experience with payments for ecosystem services (PES) highlights the effects of program design on landowner participation, impacting the program's ability to achieve environmental and, where applicable, social objectives.
