The phrase "applicable group" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific group that is relevant or suitable for a particular context or situation.
Example: "The policy changes will only affect the applicable group of employees who work in the sales department."
Alternatives: "relevant group" or "pertinent group".
The responses have been further grouped into three categories: group 1 (listed S&T outputs not achieved at all, or are not applicable), group 2 (the outputs are achieved by participants to a small extent or in part) and group 3 (the outputs are achieved to a great extent or fully).
When applicable, group effects and/or time effects were examined using separate one-way ANOVAs with Tukey post hoc comparisons.
By scoring the presence of binding sites in all promoters in mouse, we determined the statistical enrichment of GO terms for the putative targets of the applicable group of TFs; note that the set of enriched GO terms are those associated with the putative targets, not those associated with the TFs themselves.
A theory-driven design targeted at applicable groups could be a way to improve these techniques.
Specifically, doubling the duration of recovery added no knee extension compared to the duration of recovery equal to the duration of fixation in all applicable groups (P > 0.05 for all 4 comparisons; Figure 1), and quadrupling the duration of recovery, when feasible, added no gain in knee extension compared to recovery double the duration of fixation (P > 0.05 for all 3 comparisons; Figure 1).
The incidence of each observation, or when applicable, the group mean score, was tabulated and reported by stent group.
Generational identity was strongest among the baby boomers, with 79% of those within the applicable age group identifying with the "baby-boom" generation.
Driskell, Salas, and Johnston [47] observed the common phenomenon of Easterbrook's attentional narrowing is also applicable to group processes.
This significance level approach is equally applicable to group sequential one-sided tests and two-sided tests, possibly with early stopping permitted to accept the null hypothesis.
Analyses show the potential for a dynamic, computer-controlled, adaptive survey for FHS assessment applicable for group analysis and clinical decision making for individual patients.
GPs working in single-handed practice frequently noted that items on practice organisation were applicable for group practice only.
