The phrase "applicable for evaluating the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing criteria, methods, or tools that are relevant for assessment or analysis in a specific context.
Example: "The new metrics are applicable for evaluating the effectiveness of our marketing strategies."
Alternatives: "relevant for assessing the" or "suitable for analyzing the".
The present eROS assay may be applicable in part for evaluating the phototoxic risk of drug candidates after their metabolization in the early stage of drug discovery.
The water quality indices used, Bascarón (1979) adapted Water Quality Index (WQIBA) and the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment-Water Quality Index 1.0 (CCME WQI), which is a well-accepted and universally applicable computer model for evaluating the water quality index.
In the present study, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment-Water Quality Index 1.0 (CCME WQI) was used, which is a well-accepted and universally applicable computer model for evaluating the water quality index (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) 2001; Cash et al.2001; Husain 2001; Lumb et al.2002, 2006; Sharma 2002; Khan et al.2003; Paterson et al.2003).2003
If neutrality is her aim, Slavick might have pointed us to the fact that the military model for evaluating the art of war hasn't been applicable to wartime art in the West since the late nineteenth century--the last time that painters who glamorized war were made canonical to art history.
These data should be applicable to other large health maintenance organizations and would be useful for evaluating the burden of influenza/ILI in these populations.
This approach should be applicable for studying the functional evolution of any antibiotic resistance enzyme and for evaluating the evolvability of resistance enzymes to new generations of antibiotic scaffolds.
This method is applicable for retrospectively evaluating the quality of experiments and is useful for interpreting results that are not apparently reproducible.
Therefore, the ACS estimate of increased risk of lung cancer mortality from long-term exposure to PM2.5 might be more applicable for evaluating lung cancer fatalities in China than the WHO estimate.
Furthermore, the evaluation instrument developed by Kmet et al. [ 40] was applicable for evaluating studies with different designs in critical care service research, but each evaluator may understand the criteria differently.
The approach we have described is universally applicable for evaluating study designs used in epidemiologic and social science research.
