In China's grassroots society, both the applicability of policies and the pressure for implementation are complicated.
Four categorizations of policy implementation: passive implementation, normal implementation (low speed), campaign-style implementation, and normal implementation (high speed) Applicability of policy Low High Pressure for implementation Low Passive implementation Normal implementation (low speed) High Campaign-style implementation Normal implementation (high speed).
In the grassroots society, there are two dimensions in the structural context of policy implementation: the applicability of policy and the pressure for implementation.
Second, at the analytical framework level this article briefly identifies the two dimensions of the applicability of policies and the pressure for implementation with reference to the context of policy implementation.
When the applicability of policies is low and the pressure for implementation varies from low to high, policy implementation in grassroots governments can easily fluctuate and cause problems.
Fluctuation in policy implementation is derived from the tension between a low level of applicability of policies and the varying degrees of pressure for implementation in the governance mechanism.
Findings revealed the risk involved in relying blindly on international recommendations and using them without accounting for implementation barriers, contextual factors, and local applicability.
If the applicability of policies is low along with changes in pressure for implementation from above, "passive implementation" and "campaign-style implementation," which seem to oppose but are actually related to each other, will alternate and fluctuate.
A case A/E consulting firm is selected for implementation of the proposed PPS to demonstrate its applicability.
The root causes of passive implementation and campaign-style implementation lie in the low level of applicability of policies in the local contexts and changes in pressure from above for implementation.
