The phrase "any proof of wrongdoing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when inquiring about evidence or indications of misconduct or illegal activity.
Example: "The investigation will continue until we find any proof of wrongdoing by the officials involved."
Alternatives: "any evidence of misconduct" or "any indication of illegal activity".
Mr. Guo, who also goes by the name Miles Kwok, did not offer any proof of wrongdoing by the He family.
Shamil Tarpischev, president of the Russian tennis federation, told Reuters: "First of all, this Belgian sports minister has broken every ethical rule in the book by naming a player without any proof of wrongdoing, without any basic evidence".
One tool currently being employed against the legal cannabis industry is civil asset forfeiture, which allows law enforcement officers to legally take someone's property without any proof of wrongdoing and it is up to the owner to prove the innocence of their possessions.
That Mr Nozoe was quietly asked to step down without any proof of wrongdoing is also typical.In this section Green shoots The best plane loses Boomerang A meeting of mines Clouds under the hammer Cheques and balances South sea bubble Skirting the issue ReprintsThe irony is that under Mr Nozoe, Fujitsu was a model of corporate reform.
The association argues that should a court require Airbnb to comply with the NYAG's demands, it would set a "dangerous and harmful precedent" whereby local governments could request large swaths of information about users without showing any proof of wrongdoing.
The BBC has established that letters sent to members of the England bid team this week have asked for any "anecdotal" or "evidential" proof of wrongdoing involving Fifa members.
"I defend any member of our party as long as there's no proof of wrongdoing, but as simple mortals we can commit errors," Ricardo Canavati, the PRI's current president in Nuevo Leon, said in an interview in a Monterrey hotel.
With Lay's conviction erased, neither the SEC nor any other civil plaintiff will be able to use it as proof of wrongdoing (though it would still be able to use evidence and testimony given in the trial, says Henning).
Unless the Supreme Court says that the Constitution forbids this kind of search, the sniff test at a private home without proof of wrongdoing will set a precedent for intrusion into any home.
I don't have proof of wrongdoing -- and I certainly can't say with any certainty that the "special ingredient" referred to is toxic or addicting.
