The phrase "any material fact" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to refer to facts that are significant or relevant to a particular situation or case.
Example: "The court must consider any material fact that could influence the outcome of the trial."
Alternatives: "any significant fact" or "any relevant fact".
But in a decision released today, United States District Judge Michael A. Telesca granted 3Com's dismissal motion, saying there was "no genuine issue as to any material fact".
It prohibits the use of "any unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or the knowing concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression or omission".
Judge Norman Mordue of United States District Court found that "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact" in the 1995 antitrust case, and ordered that it be dismissed in a decision rendered on June 29.
They have sworn in front of a notary that, "to the best of my knowledge", their latest annual and quarterly reports neither contain an "untrue statement" nor omit any "material fact" (see article).
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 states that it is a violation to make statements intended to induce others to buy or sell stock "which was at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any material fact, and which he knew or had reasonable ground to believe was so false or misleading".
Fortunately, we live in a world where people are extremely stock-price conscious, and a world where public companies are required, by law, to publish any material facts.
Chisam told an ethics panel of four Republicans and four Democrats, "There are no... issues as to any material facts in this case.
It is strange then to see the resurgence of those headlines, surfacing in a vacuum, without any material facts to support them.
The court ruled that the only entity that can be held liable in a private lawsuit for "any untrue statement of a material fact" is the one whose name the statement is presented under.
That is a deliberate misrepresentation of a material fact".
Isn't an injury that makes you a one-handed fighter a material fact?
